An essay concerning the origin of action (in part); primarily concerning whether one can act only for the sake of justice.

Answer to objective ethics.

Chapter 1 presented the central principle of a fair discernment between right and wrong. But when acts do go wrong, this discernment must inform us what we can pursue in turn. Chapter 2 explains.

A meaningful idea of justice cannot be grounded in an idea of goodness, but instead only on an idea of permission/prohibition.

Who cares if we agree what art is? People still love a crazy looking sculpture even if they aren't sure whether it's art, or even whether it's beautiful. Then why do we care so much about understanding gender? Is it not enough to "move on" from gender and just respect people for who they are? Let's talk about it.

Introductory remarks about a series of eight, 10-page essays I will release in 2025. Includes, preface/introduction/release timetable/summaries of each essay.